Skip to main content

Der Bauern-Spiegel


I am not making as much progress on things as I need to so far this summer, but I did manage yesterday to finish re-reading Der Bauern-Spiegel, the first novel by my man Jeremias Gotthelf, pictured above.  The title means "The Peasant's Mirror," but I might translate it into English as Reflections on a Peasant's Life, which captures the idea of "mirror" but indicates its (fictional) autobiographical character.

This first novel is in fact the source of the name "Jeremias Gotthelf," because Gotthelf wasn't really Gotthelf at all (it was a pseudonym), but rather Albert Bitzius, a Swiss pastor in the first half of the 19th century.  His book purports to be the life story of a man named, you guessed it, Jeremias Gotthelf.  Readers were persuaded that Gotthelf was the real author, so the name stuck, and Bitzius took it as the pseudonym for his future work, which was extensive.

The story is a powerful social critique of a practice that was common in Switzerland at the time as a way of caring for orphaned or abandoned children.  Called Verdingen, it amounted to a kind of reverse auctioning-off of these children to the lowest bidder.  The local village would hold a gathering once a year in which children in need of caregivers would be distributed among families willing to take them in exchange for a sum that was supposed to cover the costs of their care for the year.  As you can quickly imagine if you think about it, the incentives in such a system are all wrong: the village has an incentive to place a child with whoever will take it for the smallest sum, while the family has an incentive to get as much work out of the child as possible while spending as little as possible on his or her care (and perhaps even making a small profit off the arrangement).  It led to considerable abuse, much of which has only been fully reckoned with in the last couple of decades.  Gotthelf gives a sharp and poignant portrayal of the practice and its effects upon children.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

E-mail Wit on a Lazy Sunday Afternoon

It seems as though practically every business where I've ever bought anything in the past decade sends me e-mails about their products, specials, deal-of-the-week, etc.  Normally I delete them immediately, without a second glance. But one this afternoon made me hesitate.  I received a "Walgreens Weekly Ad" e-mail.  Its subject line read as follows: "We can't stop lowering prices." So instead of hitting "delete," I sent a quick reply: "In that case, I think I'll wait and shop next week." I have no idea whether or not that reply will go to a real e-mail address and be read by an actual human being.  But I hope so.

Non capisco!

About once a week I get an e-mail from something called the Italian Cultural Institute in New York.  I don't know why.  I know nothing about them and have no idea how I got on their mailing list.  But I generally take a quick look at the e-mail, because every now and then I see something interesting. The other day I got one of these and saw what appeared to be a potentially interesting lecture today.  It was by a professor named Stefano Jossa, currently at Royal Holloway, the University of London.  He was going to be speaking on his new book, in Italian, but the title of which in English would be The Most Beautiful in the World: Why Love the Italian Language .  It sounded intriguing, it was free, all you had to do was register and get a Zoom link.  So I did. It turned out that the lecture was actually being sponsored not by the Italian Cultural Institute in New York, but rather by the one in Montreal.  But who cares, right?  As long a...

Pandemic and Globalization: Some Thoughts

I have been promising to jot down a few thoughts on the coronavirus pandemic and globalization.  A few days ago I read an essay by John Gray, arguing that the pandemic marks a turning  point, one that will prompt a move away from liberalism, free trade, and globalization.  Gray is a thoughtful and interesting writer, and you can find his essay here -- although I don't think it is particularly compelling. Gray's analysis fits into a broader political narrative that has already been gaining traction over the past few years: that we are seeing a retreat from liberal politics and from the globalized world order as countries move increasingly in nationalist, populist, and even authoritarian directions. National populism (which can but need not be authoritarian) is a real phenomenon, in the USA, across the West, and to some extent even globally.  We see it in the election of Donald Trump, in Brexit, and in the rise of various national populist parties in the democr...