Read-a-Book Challenge

So maybe you weren't up for reading the Psalms. Or learning a foreign language. Or maybe you are just still looking for more to do. So here is one more idea to keep you from twiddling your thumbs and playing with your phones all day, the third (and final) Meilaender Challenge: Read a book! What the heck... read a bunch of books!

This is another chance at eternal renown. I will publicize the names of any student who reads more books than I do before the end of final exams on May 5. Okay, it's a little more complicated than that, but here are the rules:

1. Only books count that are not assigned for class. (Or, in my case, that I have not assigned to my students.) In other words, this is extra reading, beyond what you have to do for class anyway.

2. You may re-read a book that you have read previously, but only if you have not read it within the last two years. (If you aren't sure, use your best judgement.)

3. The books must be of at least 80 pages. If you are currently in the middle of a book, you may count it as long as you still have 80 or more pages to go.

4. But I don't want you only reading really short books just in order to beat me. Maybe you were hoping to read War and Peace or Middlemarch or Democracy in America in the month of April. So I will actually award two prizes:

one prize for the person who reads the most books; and
another prize for the person who reads the most pages (but they must still be in books of at least 80 pages).

So: I publicize the names of all students who manage to beat me (in # of books and/or # of pages), and in addition to that fame and glory, there will be small prizes for the student who reads the most books and for the one who reads the most pages.

5. You are on the honor code for keeping a list of books and pages that you read.

Finally -- you can beat me on this one. You really can. I have a lot to do. I am also responsible for five children, which you are not. (At least, I don't think so.) This is your big opportunity to whoop Meilaender. Such chances do not come around often...!

Comments

E-mail Wit on a Lazy Sunday Afternoon

It seems as though practically every business where I've ever bought anything in the past decade sends me e-mails about their products, specials, deal-of-the-week, etc. Normally I delete them immediately, without a second glance. But one this afternoon made me hesitate. I received a "Walgreens Weekly Ad" e-mail. Its subject line read as follows: "We can't stop lowering prices." So instead of hitting "delete," I sent a quick reply: "In that case, I think I'll wait and shop next week." I have no idea whether or not that reply will go to a real e-mail address and be read by an actual human being. But I hope so.

Non capisco!

About once a week I get an e-mail from something called the Italian Cultural Institute in New York. I don't know why. I know nothing about them and have no idea how I got on their mailing list. But I generally take a quick look at the e-mail, because every now and then I see something interesting. The other day I got one of these and saw what appeared to be a potentially interesting lecture today. It was by a professor named Stefano Jossa, currently at Royal Holloway, the University of London. He was going to be speaking on his new book, in Italian, but the title of which in English would be The Most Beautiful in the World: Why Love the Italian Language . It sounded intriguing, it was free, all you had to do was register and get a Zoom link. So I did. It turned out that the lecture was actually being sponsored not by the Italian Cultural Institute in New York, but rather by the one in Montreal. But who cares, right? As long a...

Pandemic and Globalization: Some Thoughts

I have been promising to jot down a few thoughts on the coronavirus pandemic and globalization. A few days ago I read an essay by John Gray, arguing that the pandemic marks a turning point, one that will prompt a move away from liberalism, free trade, and globalization. Gray is a thoughtful and interesting writer, and you can find his essay here -- although I don't think it is particularly compelling. Gray's analysis fits into a broader political narrative that has already been gaining traction over the past few years: that we are seeing a retreat from liberal politics and from the globalized world order as countries move increasingly in nationalist, populist, and even authoritarian directions. National populism (which can but need not be authoritarian) is a real phenomenon, in the USA, across the West, and to some extent even globally. We see it in the election of Donald Trump, in Brexit, and in the rise of various national populist parties in the democr...

Plague Time

Search This Blog