Skip to main content

Historic Victim of Coronavirus: The Appenzeller Landsgemeinde


Students know I have an interest in Switzerland--I am planning to teach my Switzerland class again next spring.  I have not yet been able to find anything about it in English, but was just reading an article in the Neue Zürcher Zeitung--the Zurich newspaper, and (incidentally) my own favorite--about a new casualty of the coronavirus pandemic: the Appenzeller Landsgemeinde.

The Swiss canton of Appenzell continues to practice one of the world's oldest forms of direct democracy, the Landsgemeinde, or cantonal assembly.  Once a year, the citizens of the canton gather in person, outdoors, in order to vote directly on the canton's most important matters of business.  They do this by raising their hands.

The cantonal government has just decided not to hold this year's assembly due to public health concerns.  While it would apparently have been possible to devise a system involving measures like social distancing, the government was concerned that vulnerable parts of the population, like the elderly, might be deterred by the health risks from coming to vote.

The picture at the head of this post is of a Landsgemeinde from the late 18th century, giving some sense of this institution's deep historic roots.  In fact, for as far back as they have records, some 200 or 300 years, there is apparently no instance of its being canceled.  Until now.  The voters of Appenzell have never voted in the assembly by casting actual ballots, as opposed to raising their hands.  That is pretty remarkable.

Another canton, Glarus--one of the three original members of the Swiss federation--also holds an annual Landsgemeinde and will have to decide soon what to do with its assembly this year.  (Like that in Appenzell, it was originally scheduled for earlier and has already been postponed until the fall.)  If you are interested, there is a nice video available on YouTube, about 16 minutes, about the assembly in Glarus:


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

E-mail Wit on a Lazy Sunday Afternoon

It seems as though practically every business where I've ever bought anything in the past decade sends me e-mails about their products, specials, deal-of-the-week, etc.  Normally I delete them immediately, without a second glance. But one this afternoon made me hesitate.  I received a "Walgreens Weekly Ad" e-mail.  Its subject line read as follows: "We can't stop lowering prices." So instead of hitting "delete," I sent a quick reply: "In that case, I think I'll wait and shop next week." I have no idea whether or not that reply will go to a real e-mail address and be read by an actual human being.  But I hope so.

Non capisco!

About once a week I get an e-mail from something called the Italian Cultural Institute in New York.  I don't know why.  I know nothing about them and have no idea how I got on their mailing list.  But I generally take a quick look at the e-mail, because every now and then I see something interesting. The other day I got one of these and saw what appeared to be a potentially interesting lecture today.  It was by a professor named Stefano Jossa, currently at Royal Holloway, the University of London.  He was going to be speaking on his new book, in Italian, but the title of which in English would be The Most Beautiful in the World: Why Love the Italian Language .  It sounded intriguing, it was free, all you had to do was register and get a Zoom link.  So I did. It turned out that the lecture was actually being sponsored not by the Italian Cultural Institute in New York, but rather by the one in Montreal.  But who cares, right?  As long a...

Pandemic and Globalization: Some Thoughts

I have been promising to jot down a few thoughts on the coronavirus pandemic and globalization.  A few days ago I read an essay by John Gray, arguing that the pandemic marks a turning  point, one that will prompt a move away from liberalism, free trade, and globalization.  Gray is a thoughtful and interesting writer, and you can find his essay here -- although I don't think it is particularly compelling. Gray's analysis fits into a broader political narrative that has already been gaining traction over the past few years: that we are seeing a retreat from liberal politics and from the globalized world order as countries move increasingly in nationalist, populist, and even authoritarian directions. National populism (which can but need not be authoritarian) is a real phenomenon, in the USA, across the West, and to some extent even globally.  We see it in the election of Donald Trump, in Brexit, and in the rise of various national populist parties in the democr...